Tag Archives: J.K. Rowling

Home Again

We’re back from our mini-vacation in Harrachov.  We took the ski lift to the top of the mountain this morning and walked down, then got some ice cream, took the kids to a playground, took a drive to the cottage which was stop and go due to road construction but beautiful, through Krkonoše National Park, stopped at the cottage where I picked a lot of cherries and gooseberries, the red currants are also bright on the bush but we didn’t actually stay very long.  There is really so much fruit there it’s amazing in the summer, it’s barely an acre plot and there are two vegetable gardens, a couple of apple trees, a couple of cherry trees, a couple of plum trees and, I think, one peach.  There are flowers in front of the house, a few chickens in the back and the gooseberries and currants growing on the fence around one of the vegetable gardens.  So, I pick as much as I can whenever I’m there in season and they make wine as well, but half of it just falls on the ground and rots, I’m sure.

Robert Galbraith is Really J.K. Rowling

Robert Galbraith is Really J.K. Rowling

Of course, the main conversation today is about George Zimmerman.  Like most of my liberal friends, I consider this a perversion of justice, de facto legalized murder.  The son of a bitch even got his gun back!  So, since we all agree, and I don’t even want to hear from anybody defending Zimmerman, I am already aware that the world is filled with racist, murderous filth and don’t want to be reminded, I will just say that my sympathies on this day go out to Trayvon Martin’s family, and leave it at that.

One item in the news today that pleased me was that J.K. Rowling has written another non-Potter book, actually it came out in April but, although she put her own name on The Casual Vacancy, which I thought was pretty good, she wrote this one under the pen name Robert Galbraith.  It got good reviews, but didn’t sell nearly as many copies, obviously.

I find this interesting, for a couple of reasons.  One, it reinforces my view that J.K. Rowling, in addition to being a great author, is probably a pretty cool person, too.  This is the equivalent of Paul McCartney putting on disguises and busking in the London Metro, which he has been known to do.

Second, and somewhat more negatively, it shows how hard it is to get something accepted if you are not already famous.  Of course, now it will sell like pot brownies at a rock festival.  So, maybe smart marketing, too.

Leave a comment

Filed under Blogs' Archive

Harry Potter is Over. Long Live Harry Potter.

I was very proud of myself this morning.  There was an article on Huffingtonpoop with a video about Harry Potter and I did NOT click on the link.  The description was enough – a nostalgic look back through all the films, looking at Harry, Ron and Hermione back when they were just starting at Hogwarts, blah, blah, blah.

Magically, they have achieved immortality

The article went on about how sad it was that it has all come to an end.  The thing is, it has not come to an end.  It will never come to an end.  First of all, they are movies.  If you want to watch them again, you can watch them again.  Your kids will watch them.  Your grandkids will watch them.  Even if you are 12 years old and reading this, that is true.  If you want to watch The Wizard of Oz, you can watch it, and that was made in  1939.

Secondly, the books were all completed and the die hard fans knew the plot and the ending years ago.  If you just know Harry Potter from the films, you are missing out.  Watching a retrospective of the films doesn’t mean you are nostalgic about Harry, Ron and Hermione.  It means you are looking back nostalgically on the early careers of Daniel, Rupert and Emma.

Thirdly, it is not even the end in the sense that it is the last Harry Potter themed item in any media.  I’m sure that there will be a Harry Potter TV show some day.  Some actor will eclipse Daniel Radcliffe just as surely as Alan Alda eclipsed Donald Sutherland in MASH.  Then there will be a cartoon version.  Then, when technology allows, a holographic version.  Interactive.

Here’s an idea, and any studio executive can have it, for free: a biopic of J.K. Rowling.  You could throw in lots of pics from the Potter films and do it on the cheap.  It practically writes itself.

In any event, the 7 book series on which it is all based is, indeed, finished.  I think it’s time I read them all again.

Leave a comment

Filed under Blogs' Archive

Pottermoremoney

With the premiere of the final movie of the Harry Potter series, the 8th film from the 7 book series, the Harry Potter era has come to an end.  Or has it?

Remember how small they were?

Joanne Rowling (She used J.K. because her publisher didn’t want people to know the books were written by a woman, if you can believe that shit in this day and age) has said again and again that there will be no more Potter books, and the last one  had a pretty final ending.  There will not be a Conan-Doyle type revival.  That’s fine by me.

They were great books, but all good things must come to an end, and I think she timed it pretty well.  Better than Brett Favre, better than Mohammed Ali, better than, to pick a literary example, Tom Robbins, who is probably my favorite writer of all time.  If I were asked “What famous writer would you like to write like?,” I would say Robbins, but from “Half Asleep in Frog Pajamas” onward, it’s been all crap.  I’ve talked to a lot of people who tried to tell me that “Fierce Invalids Home From Hot Climates” was a good book, but I just want to ask them “Did you read ‘Still Life With Woodpecker?’; Did you read ‘Jitterbug Perfume?'” The older Tom Robbins is a shadow of his younger self.

No, Rowling’s quitting while she’s ahead and that’s a good move.  Actually, I’d like to see her try her hand at something completely different, like a crime novel or a romance novel, but that’s up to her.  Lord knows she doesn’t need the money.

She’s still milking it, though, and that’s O.K., too.  The decision to split the last book into 2 movies is justifiable, given the length of the book, but I’m sure the fact that 2 movies will make twice as much money as one movie was a consideration.

Anyway, Rowlings latest project is Pottermore, and I’m curious what that’s going to be.  It’s a website and she says it will have a lot of reader input.  I’m not sure exactly what the goal of Pottermore is, or what it will look like.  It could be a revolutionary development in literature, as the fans begin to create a world of their own, or it could just be a way to flog Harry Potter merchandise.  I’m sure there will be at least a bit of the latter.  I hope that the emphasis is on the former.

It will launch in October, but they’re already collecting people’s e-mail addresses for ‘early membership.’  www.pottermore.com

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Blogs' Archive