I don’t understand quite what’s going on with this whole Rupert Murdoch scandal. O.K., so some reporters at the News of the World hacked into a dead girl’s phone records. Overzealousness. Obvious news value. People are acting like it’s the end of the world.
Voldemort
Tacky, yes. Offensive to the family, sure. But they didn’t kill her. Still, the News of the World is no more, the editor is in jail, Rupert Murdoch is likely to lose his business empire, the guy who broke the story is all of a sudden dead and the papers say “he had a drug and alcohol problem.” David Cameron may even be ousted as Prime Minister. I’m not quite sure what he had to do with it, but it had to be something.
Rupert also owns Fox News in the U.S., so they are probably under investigation now as well, to see if they have ever violated the integrity of recently dead people for the sake of a story.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m happy to see the mean, wrinkly old buzzard squirm. He’s committed plenty of crimes in his nasty manipulative life which deserve any anguish he is going through right now. I just don’t really understand it.
I think the answers must be in the information that hasn’t been seen by the public, i.e. the hacked phone records, and whoever it is that truly controls the world, the Masons, the Rothschild’s or the Bilderberger Group, decided to come down on Rupert Murdoch, but hard.
Which is similar to the Wikileaks case. They don’t care about some trifling little sex charge in Sweden. They don’t even care about the principle of the thing, breach of security and all that. Well, maybe that’s part of it.
But, mostly, there’s some information in there that they don’t want out.
I have no proof of this theory. It’s just a hunch, really.
www.gurukalehuru.com 