Here’s a quick quiz for those who think that 9/11 couldn’t possibly have been an inside job.
1. Who had a motive for destroying the World Trade Center?
a) Arab terrorists, because they hate America
b) Neocons, so they could pass the Patriot Act and invade Iraq
c) Larry Silverstein, owner of the World Trade Center, for the insurance
d) All of the above
(correct answer is d, all of the above)
2. Who was the director of security for the World Trade Center up until shortly before the attack?
a) Marvin Bush, George Bush’s little brother
b) somebody totally non-suspicious
(the correct answer is a)
3. How many Bush administration officials testified in public and under oath before the 9/11 commission?
a) All of them, Katie
b) 47
c) 13
d) 0
(the correct answer is d)
4. How much did Larry Silverstein collect in insurance after the attacks?
a) 100 million dollars
b) 500 million dollars
c) a billion dollars
d) 10 billion dollars
(the correct answer is d, and the insurance company paid up without any questions. How often does that happen, eh?)
5. Who arranged the evacuation of Osama Bin Laden’s relatives from the United States shortly after the attacks while all other aircraft were grounded, and in total contradiction to FBI standard procedure which is to interview families of suspects first, as you should know from watching any cop show on TV?
a) some aircraft controller guy
b) George Bush
c) Dick Cheney
d) we still don’t know
(the correct answer is d)
6. Who had the resources to pull off such a sophisticated plot?
a) the Neocons
b) Arab terrorists
(answer: definitely a, possibly b but I doubt it. They haven’t pulled off anything similar since. The attacks in Madrid and London were horrible, of course, but they weren’t anywhere near as complex)
7. Who signed the Statement of Principles of the Project for a New American Century, a conservative “think tank” (how’s that for an oxymoron), which includes the sentence “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor”
a) Donald Rumsfeld
b) Jeb Bush, another of George’s little brothers
c) Dick Cheney
d) All of the above
(the correct answer is d, plus about 20 others)
8. Outside of the twin towers and building 7 of the World Trade Center, how many other steel frame buildings, throughout the history of steel frame buildings, have suddenly and totally collapsed due to fire?
a) hundreds, happens all the time
b) 6
c) 0
(the correct answer is c)
9. What was President Bush doing at the time of the attacks?
a) playing golf
b) riding his bicycle
c) clearing brush on his ranch
d) “reading” to schoolchildren, which makes for a nice photo-op, but wasn’t exactly something he was famous for doing on a regular basis
(d, of course. You knew that one)
10. Would our government lie to us about such a thing?
a) Sure, happens all the time
b) Never in a million years
(the correct answer is a. Does the Gulf of Tonkin incident ring a bell?)
www.gurukalehuru.com 
So funny. I remember MY first conspiracy theory.
The questions are intriguing and the implications severe, but what do they actually prove? Fer instance, lots of people use the same type of reasoning to sustain their belief in “God,” but their points are also not proof.
What’s Marvin doing, lately?
That’s a good question, A. I also kind of wonder what Larry Silverstein did with the 10 billion dollars, because we certainly don’t see the results of it on site. In any event, far more questions than answers and, now that 10 years have elapsed, it’s time for another investigation.
“8. Outside of the twin towers and building 7 of the World Trade Center, how many other steel frame buildings, throughout the history of steel frame buildings, have suddenly and totally collapsed due to fire?”
How many steel frame buildings throughout history of steel frame buildings have had a full load of jet engine fuel for an accelerant? Or had the force of a plane crash as a structure destabilizer in conjunction with explosion/fire.
p.s. al-Queda is NOT happy that you’re trying to give the Bushies credit for what al-Queda claims as their greatest historical accomplishment. Next you’ll be trying to make them give back their virgins.
Most of the jet fuel blew out. In any event, that was gone within 30 seconds of impact. After that, it was a regular old fire. As far as the impact of the plane crash as a destabilizer goes, that strengthens my argument rather than weakens it. The plane hit the side of the building, it did not somehow materialize in the center and then explode, which means the collapse of the upper floors should have tilted to that side. If we’re talking about pancakes, and they fall onto a slanted plate, they’re going onto the floor but in some direction other than straight down.
In the same category, I would direct you to The Far Left Side’s 10-part 9-11 Unforgotten series. Start here: http://farleftside.com/2011/9-2-11-911-unforgotten.html
Good stuff.
One point of clarification, the insurance matters with Silverstein actually lingered for years because there was a question as to whether there was one occurrence or two occurrences which would have allowed him to make a recovery on each tower that collapsed.