Bad Journalism

Part of the problem, a very big part of the problem, is bad journalism.  It is hard  for the public to make informed decisions, or even to make informed comments, when the information is not readily available.
A very good friend of mine, sweetest woman  in the world, is  of the ‘Vote  Blue no matter who’ persuasion, which I vehemently disagree with, as anybody who’s read any of my comments over the past year and a bit knows.  Anyway, she posted an article about how Democrats won a formerly Republican seat.  It was just in the NY state legislature, but that stuff counts, too.   I was about to make a snide comment about ‘Is he a Berniecrat or just your run of the mill corporate owned might-as-well-be-a-Republican kind of Democrat,’ but, I decided I  should read the article first, which I often don’t do, on  the off chance that that information was contained therein.  It was not.

That should be an obligatory item in any article about a Democrat  winning a seat.  It’s important, and lots of people want to know.  Lots of people base their vote on that kind of information.  It is journalistic malpractice to leave it out.  How  does a journalist know if the candidate is a Berniecrat or not?  The journalist asks.
Except the journalists don’t.  And that is a big problem.

Leave a comment

Filed under Blogs' Archive

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s